Trending News

Blog Post


Chinese language tech start-ups pull IPO plans as Beijing tightens scrutiny By Reuters 


© Reuters. Signal for STAR Market is seen after the itemizing ceremony of the primary batch of corporations at Shanghai Inventory Trade in Shanghai


By Samuel Shen and Scott Murdoch

SHANGHAI/HONG KONG (Reuters) – A rising variety of Chinese language tech start-ups are cancelling plans to checklist on Nasdaq-style markets at residence with some eyeing Hong Kong share gross sales as an alternative, as regulators tighten scrutiny of IPO candidates after the halting of Ant Group’s $37 billion float.

Over 100 corporations have voluntarily withdrawn purposes to checklist on Shanghai’s STAR Market and Shenzhen’s ChiNext since Ant’s termination of its preliminary public providing (IPO) in November, in response to Reuters overview of trade filings.

The unprecedented withdrawals come in opposition to the backdrop of sharply intensified grilling of itemizing prospects by regulators, resulting in IPO delays, outright rejection and even penalties, say bankers and firm executives.

The scramble to withdraw IPO purposes raises questions over the standard of China’s IPOs and robustness of due diligence executed by their underwriters.

The pattern, if it continues, would threaten China’s ambition to compete with world itemizing venues equivalent to Hong Kong and New York at a time when Beijing can be contemplating establishing a brand new bourse to draw overseas-listed companies.

China launched STAR almost two years in the past with a U.S.-style registration and disclosure-based IPO regime in a bid to dissuade its tech start-ups from tapping offshore bourses, and to fast-track listings. The reform prolonged to ChiNext final 12 months.

However Ant’s IPO, which was suspended after regulators expressed considerations about some components of its companies, shifted the watchdog’s consideration in the direction of danger management, mentioned a banker with direct data of regulators’ pondering.

“Regulators are demanding extra stringent due diligence from underwriters,” mentioned the banker, who declined to be recognized.

Sponsors, or the lead IPO underwriters, are withdrawing some purposes for concern of being punished, he mentioned, as “no mission is impeccable.”

The STAR Market turned the world’s fourth hottest itemizing venue in 2020, with IPOs elevating $20 billion. Its rating fell to the seventh within the first quarter, in response to Refinitiv knowledge.

“There is a tech bubble in China,” mentioned Yiming Feng, accomplice at Atom Enterprise Capital. “It is time for a clean-up.”

The China Securities Regulatory Fee (CSRC), STAR and ChiNext did not reply to Reuters request for remark.


DaoCloud, a Shanghai-based cloud computing start-up, had deliberate a STAR IPO this 12 months, however is now contemplating a Hong Kong itemizing as an alternative, deterred by the probability of approval delays.

IPO candidates “now face a variety of regulatory uncertainty,” mentioned Roby Chen, DaoClould’s founder. “So we want a plan B.”

For others with no speedy plans for an abroad itemizing, the precedence is to hunt recent personal funding.

A number of synthetic intelligence unicorns, start-ups valued at $1 billion or above, “have come to me with their enterprise plans, and search financing,” mentioned Abraham Zhang, chairman of Shenzhen-based enterprise capital agency China Europe Capital.

Loss-making tech unicorns which have shelved their itemizing plans embrace Yitu Ltd, Unisound AI Expertise Co and Shenzhen Royole Applied sciences Co, in response to trade knowledge.

Ming Liao, founding accomplice of Beijing-based Prospect Avenue Capital, mentioned many Chinese language start-ups now face a bumpy street in the direction of IPOs, with a few of them struggling to “exhibit their potential for sustainable development.”


CSRC Chairman Yi Huiman final month urged underwriters to tighten scrutiny of IPO candidates, vowing to punish these attempting to convey “sick” companies to the market.

Bankers say bourses are actually launching on-site inspections, poring over IPO filings and bombarding sponsors with a great deal of questions – practices that weren’t frequent earlier.

As well as, senior executives of a start-up should disclose their private financial institution accounts and clarify giant transactions.

In consequence, the typical ready time has blown out from six months to 12, making a backlog of over 100 corporations ready to checklist on STAR, mentioned a banker.

The brand new IPO system lured many corporations searching for a swift itemizing, and now, “regulators are utilizing relentless consideration to particulars and on-site inspections to intimidate them away,” mentioned an funding banker who has a number of IPO offers caught.

“It defies the aim of the IPO reform, which is to provide the market the facility to judge corporations.”

Supply hyperlink

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *