Court rules California ride hailing law unconstitutional
Close-up of vertical sign with logos for ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft.
Smith Collection | Gado | Getty Images
A California judge on Friday ruled that a 2020 ballot measure that exempted ride-share and food delivery drivers from a state labor law is unconstitutional as it infringed on the legislature’s power to set standards at the workplace.
Proposition 22 is unconstitutional as “it limits the power of a future Legislature to define app-based drivers as workers subject to workers’ compensation law”, which makes the entire ballot measure “unenforceable”, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch wrote in the ruling.
The ballot measure was meant to cement app-based food delivery and ride-hail drivers’ status as independent contractors, not employees.
Known as Proposition 22, it marked the culmination of years of legal and legislative wrangling over a business model that has introduced millions of people to the convenience of ordering food or a ride with the push of a button.
Charles Schwab is Trading at All-Time Highs, is it Still a Buy? By StockNews
© Reuters. Charles Schwab is Trading at All-Time Highs, is it Still a Buy? Impressive third-quarter earnings and increased retail…
Verizon profit tops expectations, broadband continues to see growth
Verizon Communications Inc. topped earnings estimates for its latest quarter but came up a bit short on revenue as the…